Table › Companies › Kansai Electric Power Co

Initials from the entity name. Click the row to open the full profile.Kansai Electric Power CoGenerating electricity and heat — mostly by burning coal, gas, or oil. Japan
4.5 million
cars driven for a year
20.5 Mt CO₂e
falling -6%/yr

🔥 Kansai Electric Power Co ranks #123 because its tracked power plants burn fossil fuels at scale.

How much of this entity's emissions could be tied to a named owner.How sure we are about the numbers — based on data coverage, recency and source agreement.Number of power plants or sites attributed to this entity in the Climate TRACE dataset.
⚔ CompareSee the proof
Climate Damage Score: 0–100. Bigger means more greenhouse gas this year. Built only from measured emissions and trend.
#123 of 1649

Kansai Electric Power Co, based in Japan, generates electricity and heat, largely by burning fossil fuels. Climate TRACE attributes 6 high-emitting assets to it. Its largest tracked activities are electricity generation.

Burns coal, gas or oilFossil fuels are combusted in power stations to generate electricity.
Releases CO₂That combustion sends carbon dioxide straight into the atmosphere.
Traps heatExtra CO₂ thickens the greenhouse blanket, warming the planet.
See the proof

Power plants & sites behind it6 attributed assets · ownership split equally across listed owners

AssetSectorOwnershipAttributedConf.
Maizuru power stationPower100%5.9 Mtmedium
Himeji Daini power stationPower100%4.3 Mtvery low
Nanko power stationPower100%4.3 Mtvery low
Sakai Port power stationPower100%3 Mtmedium
Himeji Daiichi power stationPower100%1.9 Mtvery low
Bluewaters power stationPower50%1.1 Mtmedium
Where this comes from
Climate TRACE — asset-level emissions & ownership · CC BY 4.0
Power · reference year 2024
How it's allowed

Signals below are derived from emissions data and ownership coverage only — not from any legal or regulatory finding.

Permitted Emissions
These emissions appear to occur under existing permits and regulations. Operating legally is not the same as operating cleanly.
Fossil-Fuel Power Generation
Attributed emissions include fossil-fuel power generation, which is among the most carbon-intensive ways to produce electricity.
Improving Trajectory
Attributed emissions are falling (~6%/yr) — an improving trajectory, though absolute output remains large.
Low Measurement Confidence
Measurement confidence for this entity is low; figures are best-available estimates.
No Verified Enforcement or Lobbying Record
This dataset contains no verified enforcement actions, lobbying records, subsidies, or litigation for this entity. Absence of evidence here is not evidence of compliance or of any violation.

Climate Villains makes no claim that any entity has broken any law. These are data-derived signals, not allegations.

Trend
Improving▼ −5.5% falling
20.1 Mt22.4 Mt24.8 Mt20222024

Attributed emissions are falling by about +5.5% per year. Attributed emissions, 2022–2024.

It ranks #123 mainly because its attributed assets emitted about 20.5 Mt CO₂e in 2024 (≈ 4.5M cars/yr).

The Climate Damage Score is driven by that absolute size on a log scale, with a -0.6-point improving adjustment.

Score breakdown

Absolute emissions
86 pts
Trend modifier
▼ −5.5% falling-0.6 pts
Data confidence
How sure we are about the measurement. A low score doesn't lower the polluter's rank — it just shows the data is fuzzier.

See the full methodology for how the score is built, or data & coverage for how complete the underlying numbers are.

What we know · what we don't

What we know

  • Attributed emissions: 20.5 Mt CO₂e in 2024 (≈ 4.5M cars/yr).
  • Primary sector: Power; primary country: Japan.
  • Evidence: 6 assets; ~95% ownership-attribution coverage.
  • Source: Climate TRACE (CC BY 4.0).

What we don’t

  • Exact ownership percentages — Climate TRACE lists owners but not stakes, so shared assets are split equally.
  • Indirect (supply-chain / financed / product-use) emissions are not included.
  • No PR claims, lobbying records, litigation history or policy-compliance data are included.
How sure we are about the measurement. A low score doesn't lower the polluter's rank — it just shows the data is fuzzier.How much of this entity's emissions could be tied to a named owner. Higher means a more complete picture.