Table CompaniesInter RAO – Electric Power Generation JSC

Initials from the entity name. Click the row to open the full profile.

Inter RAO – Electric Power Generation JSC

Generating electricity and heat, mostly by burning coal, gas, or oil. RussiaOfficial site ↗
13.7 million
cars driven for a year
63.2 Mt = megatonne: one million tonnes of CO₂-equivalent CO₂e
flat year-on-year

Inter RAO – Electric Power Generation JSC ranks #16 because its tracked power plants burn fossil fuels at scale.

How much of this entity's emissions could be tied to a named owner.How sure the numbers are, based on data coverage, recency and source agreement.Number of power plants or sites attributed to this entity in the Climate TRACE dataset.
Climate Damage Score: 0–100. Bigger means more greenhouse gas this year. Built only from measured emissions and trend.
#16 of 1649

Measured operational emissions, not a full corporate footprint or a legal finding. How this works · Report a correction

↓ Download Inter RAO – Electric Power Generation JSC assets

Inter RAO – Electric Power Generation JSC, based in Russian Federation, generates electricity and heat, largely by burning fossil fuels. Climate TRACE attributes 9 high-emitting assets to it. Its largest tracked activities are electricity generation.

Burns coal, gas or oilFossil fuels are combusted in power stations to generate electricity.
Releases CO₂That combustion sends carbon dioxide straight into the atmosphere.
Traps heatExtra CO₂ thickens the greenhouse blanket, warming the planet.
See the proof

Power plants & sites behind it9 attributed assets · ownership split equally across listed owners

AssetSectorOwnershipAttributedConf.
Kostromskaya GRES power stationPower100%15.4 Mt = megatonne: one million tonnes of CO₂-equivalentvery low
Perm GRES power stationPower100%9.4 Mt = megatonne: one million tonnes of CO₂-equivalentvery low
Iriklinsk GRES power stationPower100%8.7 Mt = megatonne: one million tonnes of CO₂-equivalentvery low
Gusinoozyorskaya power stationPower100%8.5 Mt = megatonne: one million tonnes of CO₂-equivalentvery low
Yuzhnouralskaya GRES-2 power stationPower100%5.3 Mt = megatonne: one million tonnes of CO₂-equivalentvery low
Kharanorskaya power stationPower100%4.5 Mt = megatonne: one million tonnes of CO₂-equivalentvery low
Pechora GRES power stationPower100%4.4 Mt = megatonne: one million tonnes of CO₂-equivalentvery low
Verkhnetagilskaya GRES power plantPower100%3.5 Mt = megatonne: one million tonnes of CO₂-equivalentvery low
Kaliningrad CHP-2 power stationPower100%3.5 Mt = megatonne: one million tonnes of CO₂-equivalentvery low
Where this comes from
Power · reference year 2024
Who profits

Hand-curated shareholder, revenue and investor context from primary public sources. This data is shown alongside the Climate Damage Score, but it is not used to compute it.

About this data. Institutional investors like BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street typically hold shares on behalf of clients; appearing in shareholder records does not mean they control or direct the company. State entities and individuals with majority stakes are different and labelled accordingly.

Visit Inter RAO UES
publicListed: IRAO.MEParent: Rosneftegaz / Rosatom / Inter RAO Ca…HQ Russian Federation

Revenue

$16BUSD · FY2022

Source: Wikipedia — Inter RAO

Emissions intensity

3.95Mt = megatonne: one million tonnes of CO₂-equivalentCO₂e / $1bn revenue

Above the curated-sample median (2.02 Mt = megatonne: one million tonnes of CO₂-equivalent/$bn): more emissions per dollar of revenue than the typical large emitter on record.

Top shareholders & investors

  • Rosneftegaz (state)27.6%state
  • Inter RAO Capital (treasury)29.4%corporate
  • FSK EES (Federal Grid, state)8.6%state

Source: primary public filings via Wikipedia. Stakes can change; see filings for the latest.

Effectively state-controlled via multiple state-owned holdings. Ownership disclosure has narrowed after 2022 sanctions.

How it's allowed

Signals below are derived from emissions data and ownership coverage only, not from any legal or regulatory finding.

Permitted Emissions
These emissions appear to occur under existing permits and regulations. Operating legally is not the same as operating cleanly.
Fossil-Fuel Power Generation
Attributed emissions include fossil-fuel power generation, which is among the most carbon-intensive ways to produce electricity.
Low Measurement Confidence
Measurement confidence for this entity is low; figures are best-available estimates.
No Verified Enforcement or Lobbying Record
This dataset contains no verified enforcement actions, lobbying records, subsidies, or litigation for this entity. Absence of evidence here is not evidence of compliance or of any violation.

Climate Villains makes no claim that any entity has broken any law. These are data-derived signals, not allegations.

Trend
Roughly flat −0.9% falling
63 Mt66.3 Mt69.5 Mt20222024

Attributed emissions are roughly stable year on year. Attributed emissions, 2022–2024.

It ranks #16 mainly because its attributed assets emitted about 63.2 Mt CO₂e in 2024 (≈ 13.7M cars/yr).

The Climate Damage Score is driven by that absolute size on a log scale, with a -0.1-point flat adjustment.

Score breakdown

Absolute emissions
91 pts
Trend modifier
−0.9% falling-0.1 pts
Data confidence
How sure the measurement is. A low score doesn't lower the polluter's rank; it just flags fuzzier data.

See the full methodology for how the score is built, or data & coverage for how complete the underlying numbers are.

What's known · what isn't

What’s known

  • Attributed emissions: 63.2 Mt CO₂e in 2024 (≈ 13.7M cars/yr).
  • Primary sector: Power; primary country: Russian Federation.
  • Evidence: 9 assets; ~100% ownership-attribution coverage.
  • Source: Climate TRACE (CC BY 4.0).

What isn’t

  • Exact ownership percentages: Climate TRACE lists owners but not stakes, so shared assets are split equally.
  • Indirect (supply-chain / financed / product-use) emissions are not included.
  • No PR claims, lobbying records, litigation history or policy-compliance data are included.
How sure the measurement is. A low score doesn't lower the polluter's rank; it just flags fuzzier data.How much of this entity's emissions could be tied to a named owner. Higher means a more complete picture.