Initials from the entity name. Click the row to open the full profile.Lafarge Cement Company Egypt SAEHeavy industry: steel, cement, chemicals, aluminium.🇪🇬 Egypt
1 million
cars driven for a year
4.8 Mt CO₂e
–flat year-on-year
🔥 Lafarge Cement Company Egypt SAE ranks #530 because its heavy-industry plants (steel, cement, chemicals) release CO₂ in their core processes.
How much of this entity's emissions could be tied to a named owner.How sure we are about the numbers — based on data coverage, recency and source agreement.Number of power plants or sites attributed to this entity in the Climate TRACE dataset.
Climate Damage Score: 0–100. Bigger means more greenhouse gas this year. Built only from measured emissions and trend.
#530 of 1649
Lafarge Cement Company Egypt SAE, based in Egypt, runs heavy industry such as steel, cement, chemicals or aluminium. Climate TRACE attributes 2 high-emitting assets to it. Its largest tracked activities are cement production.
1High-temperature heatIndustrial furnaces burn large amounts of fuel for process heat.
2Process emissionsSome reactions (e.g. making cement clinker) release CO₂ directly, on top of fuel use.
3Traps heatThe combined CO₂ adds to global warming.
🧾See the proof▾
Power plants & sites behind it2 attributed assets · ownership split equally across listed owners
Signals below are derived from emissions data and ownership coverage only — not from any legal or regulatory finding.
Permitted Emissions
These emissions appear to occur under existing permits and regulations. Operating legally is not the same as operating cleanly.
Hard-to-Abate Process Emissions
Cement, steel and similar processes emit CO₂ from the chemical reaction itself, not only from burning fuel — making them hard to fully decarbonise.
Low Measurement Confidence
Measurement confidence for this entity is low; figures are best-available estimates.
No Verified Enforcement or Lobbying Record
This dataset contains no verified enforcement actions, lobbying records, subsidies, or litigation for this entity. Absence of evidence here is not evidence of compliance or of any violation.
Climate Villains makes no claim that any entity has broken any law. These are data-derived signals, not allegations.
📈Trend▾
Roughly flat▼ −0.3% falling
Attributed emissions are roughly stable year on year. Attributed emissions, 2022–2024.
It ranks #530 mainly because its attributed assets emitted about 4.8 Mt CO₂e in 2024 (≈ 1M cars/yr).
The Climate Damage Score is driven by that absolute size on a log scale, with no trend adjustment applied.
Score breakdown
Absolute emissions
78 pts
Trend modifier
▼ −0.3% falling0 pts
Data confidence
How sure we are about the measurement. A low score doesn't lower the polluter's rank — it just shows the data is fuzzier.
See the full methodology for how the score is built, or data & coverage for how complete the underlying numbers are.
❓What we know · what we don't▾
What we know
Attributed emissions: 4.8 Mt CO₂e in 2024 (≈ 1M cars/yr).
Exact ownership percentages — Climate TRACE lists owners but not stakes, so shared assets are split equally.
Indirect (supply-chain / financed / product-use) emissions are not included.
No PR claims, lobbying records, litigation history or policy-compliance data are included.
How sure we are about the measurement. A low score doesn't lower the polluter's rank — it just shows the data is fuzzier.How much of this entity's emissions could be tied to a named owner. Higher means a more complete picture.