Table › Companies › Hanwha Group

Initials from the entity name. Click the row to open the full profile.

Hanwha Group

Heavy industry: steel, cement, chemicals, aluminium. South Korea
562 thousand
cars driven for a year
2.6 Mt = megatonne: one million tonnes of CO₂-equivalent CO₂e
falling -4%/yr

Hanwha Group ranks #795 because its heavy-industry plants (steel, cement, chemicals) release CO₂ in their core processes.

How much of this entity's emissions could be tied to a named owner.How sure the numbers are, based on data coverage, recency and source agreement.Number of power plants or sites attributed to this entity in the Climate TRACE dataset.
CompareSee the proof
Climate Damage Score: 0–100. Bigger means more greenhouse gas this year. Built only from measured emissions and trend.
#795 of 1649

Measured operational emissions, not a full corporate footprint or a legal finding. How this works · Report a correction

↓ Download Hanwha Group assets

Hanwha Group, based in Republic of Korea, runs heavy industry such as steel, cement, chemicals or aluminium. Climate TRACE attributes 2 high-emitting assets to it.

High-temperature heatIndustrial furnaces burn large amounts of fuel for process heat.
Process emissionsSome reactions (e.g. making cement clinker) release CO₂ directly, on top of fuel use.
Traps heatThe combined CO₂ adds to global warming.
See the proof

Power plants & sites behind it2 attributed assets · ownership split equally across listed owners

AssetSectorOwnershipAttributedConf.
Yeochon NCC, Yeochun Manufacturing50%1.5 Mt = megatonne: one million tonnes of CO₂-equivalentvery low
Hanwha TotalEnergies Petrochemical, Daesan Manufacturing50%1 Mt = megatonne: one million tonnes of CO₂-equivalentvery low
Where this comes from
Climate TRACE · asset-level emissions & ownership · CC BY 4.0
Manufacturing · reference year 2024
How it's allowed

Signals below are derived from emissions data and ownership coverage only, not from any legal or regulatory finding.

Permitted Emissions
These emissions appear to occur under existing permits and regulations. Operating legally is not the same as operating cleanly.
Ownership Data Gaps
Only 50% of this entity's attributed emissions trace to a clearly identified owner. Incomplete ownership data limits accountability.
Improving Trajectory
Attributed emissions are falling (~4%/yr): an improving trajectory, though absolute output remains large.
Low Measurement Confidence
Measurement confidence for this entity is low; figures are best-available estimates.
No Verified Enforcement or Lobbying Record
This dataset contains no verified enforcement actions, lobbying records, subsidies, or litigation for this entity. Absence of evidence here is not evidence of compliance or of any violation.

Climate Villains makes no claim that any entity has broken any law. These are data-derived signals, not allegations.

Trend
Improving▼ −4.3% falling
2.5 Mt2.8 Mt3 Mt20222024

Attributed emissions are falling by about +4.3% per year. Attributed emissions, 2022–2024.

It ranks #795 mainly because its attributed assets emitted about 2.6 Mt CO₂e in 2024 (≈ 562k cars/yr).

The Climate Damage Score is driven by that absolute size on a log scale, with a -0.4-point improving adjustment.

Score breakdown

Absolute emissions
75 pts
Trend modifier
▼ −4.3% falling-0.4 pts
Data confidence
How sure the measurement is. A low score doesn't lower the polluter's rank; it just flags fuzzier data.

See the full methodology for how the score is built, or data & coverage for how complete the underlying numbers are.

What's known · what isn't

What’s known

  • Attributed emissions: 2.6 Mt CO₂e in 2024 (≈ 562k cars/yr).
  • Primary sector: Manufacturing; primary country: Republic of Korea.
  • Evidence: 2 assets; ~50% ownership-attribution coverage.
  • Source: Climate TRACE (CC BY 4.0).

What isn’t

  • Exact ownership percentages: Climate TRACE lists owners but not stakes, so shared assets are split equally.
  • Indirect (supply-chain / financed / product-use) emissions are not included.
  • Some of this sector's emissions could not be attributed to any named owner.
  • No PR claims, lobbying records, litigation history or policy-compliance data are included.
How sure the measurement is. A low score doesn't lower the polluter's rank; it just flags fuzzier data.How much of this entity's emissions could be tied to a named owner. Higher means a more complete picture.